Monday, July 20, 2009
More from Max Keiser on Goldman Sachs
More from a very heated Max Keiser on Goldman-Sachs, conflict of interest between government and Goldman Sachs , financial crimes on Wall Street, The Federal Reserve Bank, the bank of settlements in Switzerland, the next upcoming bank crisis, and this weasel he is talking to trying to introduce a international bank and currency, as has been the problem reaction design of the power that be all along. This is what this whole engineered financial collapse is all about: a way to get people to accept a world government, a world currency, managed by a small elite. They laugh at Max because the guy is amusing, but this is no laughing matter. We need to pay huge attention to these developments, while we can still stop them from occuring. Auditing the fed is a good place to start.
Saturday, July 18, 2009
No to mandatory vaccination
Mandatory vaccinations coming in the fall from the same people (Baxter, do a search look them up or get a brief idea here) whose vaccines were found tainted with avian flu last year and by those who (FDA) have been allowing for untold amounts of mercury to be injected in children. Be aware that a triple shot of vaccine is on its way this fall and that Mercury is a toxin with cumulative effects.
Three Shots in the fall, instead of one
Vaccines, Mercury Neurotoxicity and Autism
Vaccine Nation: A documentary on Vaccines and Autism
Mandatory Vaccines: is it possible?
Keep in mind that the pharmaceutical companies producing the vaccine are being given legal immunity in case of damages, justified by the fact that they are having to rush through the vaccine manufacturing process to meet the "urgent" swine flu crisis (despite the fact that very few people have died of this flu so far, the swine flu is being treated as urgent and the WHO has raised the swine flu status to level 6 pandemic). And yet, even if the pharmaceutical companies themselves cannot vouch for the vaccine safety, it appears that if the federal gvt were to declare the need for mandatory vaccinations, apparently there are no rights to exemption. This fact is explained quite well in the interesting call below, made by a concerned citizen to an Arkansas state official, who explains how, due to a supreme court ruling, mandatory vaccinations during an emergency cannot be refused.
The legalities of mandatory vaccinations- P1
The legalities of mandatory vaccinations- P2
The debate whether the gvt should be allowed to decide for you what can be injected in your body is an interesting one (especially in light of how many health problems are associated with vaccines- also see swine flu vaccines of 1976 video below) and one it would be better to resolve before this mandatory vaccination hits (many expect this to be occurring in the fall).
Many people are not happy with the swine flu situation and Austrian journalist Jane Burgemeister is filing charges against the World Health Organization. Find a relevant article here, but you can also look her up and you will find various recent interviews of her on YouTube. Also find the link to Jane Burgermeister's blog regrading this lawsuit.
Jane Burgermeister's Blog
Jane Burgermeister's lawsuit
As usual for you to read, watch, ponder. I am not endorsing any of these views specifically, but it is good to be informed and to have the opportunity to think about all of these issues, while we still have the time to rise a debate.
Three Shots in the fall, instead of one
Vaccines, Mercury Neurotoxicity and Autism
Vaccine Nation: A documentary on Vaccines and Autism
Mandatory Vaccines: is it possible?
Keep in mind that the pharmaceutical companies producing the vaccine are being given legal immunity in case of damages, justified by the fact that they are having to rush through the vaccine manufacturing process to meet the "urgent" swine flu crisis (despite the fact that very few people have died of this flu so far, the swine flu is being treated as urgent and the WHO has raised the swine flu status to level 6 pandemic). And yet, even if the pharmaceutical companies themselves cannot vouch for the vaccine safety, it appears that if the federal gvt were to declare the need for mandatory vaccinations, apparently there are no rights to exemption. This fact is explained quite well in the interesting call below, made by a concerned citizen to an Arkansas state official, who explains how, due to a supreme court ruling, mandatory vaccinations during an emergency cannot be refused.
The legalities of mandatory vaccinations- P1
The legalities of mandatory vaccinations- P2
The debate whether the gvt should be allowed to decide for you what can be injected in your body is an interesting one (especially in light of how many health problems are associated with vaccines- also see swine flu vaccines of 1976 video below) and one it would be better to resolve before this mandatory vaccination hits (many expect this to be occurring in the fall).
Many people are not happy with the swine flu situation and Austrian journalist Jane Burgemeister is filing charges against the World Health Organization. Find a relevant article here, but you can also look her up and you will find various recent interviews of her on YouTube. Also find the link to Jane Burgermeister's blog regrading this lawsuit.
Jane Burgermeister's Blog
Jane Burgermeister's lawsuit
As usual for you to read, watch, ponder. I am not endorsing any of these views specifically, but it is good to be informed and to have the opportunity to think about all of these issues, while we still have the time to rise a debate.
A final Interview with Aaron Russo
Whatever you think of Alex Jones ( the interviewer), this is a great interview with the late Aaron Russo, film director, who spent the later part of is life making movies about the Federal Reserve, IRS and other stuff. Also he reveals inside information on the plans for our world, that were given to him by a member of the top banking families who befriended him before he started off on this journey. A fascinating interview. Russo lost his battle to Cancer in 2007.
Thursday, July 9, 2009
A few thoughts on the financial collapse
An interesting take on the collapsing economy by Max Keiser, with a particular focus on the US treasury as working not for the people but for Goldman Sachs
As you watch this keep in mind that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank is involved with Goldman Sachs (I do not have a source for the information below on who owns the fed, I had it but I lost it, please send me a source if you have it). This info is old, so obviously the banks that collapsed last fall have been absorbed by other banks.
THE TEN MEMBER BANKS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE(2006)
All owned by the Rothschilds
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Also keep in mind that the current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner used to be the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and that he is a CFR member as well as an attendee of the last Builderberg meeting in Greece 2009. Also keep in mind that the previous Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson used to be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs.
Timothy Geithner and the Fed
Henry Paulson and Goldman-Sachs
May you come to your own conclusions at what all this means. When doing so keep in mind that this is an engineered financial collapse that is not going to affect these banks much at all. In fact seen that most money does not exist and is simple debt ( see the videos below for an explanation on how the fractional reserve banking works and how we are exchanging real assets for made up money)
And then see how a financial collapse will actually enrich these banks, because as people default on their mortgages and loans, the banks that remain standing will absorb all real physical assets for money they never truly gave you in the first place. Its a win win for the banks.
This without even touching the subject of the agenda of destabilization of western nation states, so that we may docily give our our national sovereignty and be lead into a one world currency and government...but we will leave that bit for another post....
All this is posted for awareness not so that you get depressed...there is still time to change things, so that these scenarios do not occur. For the activists out there: spread the word. For the metaphysicals and lightworkers: now is the time for you to call in your guides, lightwork teams on the inner planes and councils and ask for intervention in accordance with free will and karmic law for these machinations to be exposed, opposed and turned around now. Check my blog here on MySpace and metaphysical articles on my web site for more on how to make karmically appropriate metaphysical interventions regarding collective consciousness (will be uploading some new articles in the next few days).
Much love and blessings to you all
Katie
As you watch this keep in mind that the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank is involved with Goldman Sachs (I do not have a source for the information below on who owns the fed, I had it but I lost it, please send me a source if you have it). This info is old, so obviously the banks that collapsed last fall have been absorbed by other banks.
THE TEN MEMBER BANKS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE(2006)
All owned by the Rothschilds
Rothschild Bank of London
Warburg Bank of Hamburg
Rothschild Bank of Berlin
Lehman Brothers of New York
Lazard Brothers of Paris
Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York
Israel Moses Seif Banks of Italy
Goldman, Sachs of New York
Warburg Bank of Amsterdam
Chase Manhattan Bank of New York
Also keep in mind that the current Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner used to be the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and that he is a CFR member as well as an attendee of the last Builderberg meeting in Greece 2009. Also keep in mind that the previous Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson used to be Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Goldman Sachs.
Timothy Geithner and the Fed
Henry Paulson and Goldman-Sachs
May you come to your own conclusions at what all this means. When doing so keep in mind that this is an engineered financial collapse that is not going to affect these banks much at all. In fact seen that most money does not exist and is simple debt ( see the videos below for an explanation on how the fractional reserve banking works and how we are exchanging real assets for made up money)
And then see how a financial collapse will actually enrich these banks, because as people default on their mortgages and loans, the banks that remain standing will absorb all real physical assets for money they never truly gave you in the first place. Its a win win for the banks.
This without even touching the subject of the agenda of destabilization of western nation states, so that we may docily give our our national sovereignty and be lead into a one world currency and government...but we will leave that bit for another post....
All this is posted for awareness not so that you get depressed...there is still time to change things, so that these scenarios do not occur. For the activists out there: spread the word. For the metaphysicals and lightworkers: now is the time for you to call in your guides, lightwork teams on the inner planes and councils and ask for intervention in accordance with free will and karmic law for these machinations to be exposed, opposed and turned around now. Check my blog here on MySpace and metaphysical articles on my web site for more on how to make karmically appropriate metaphysical interventions regarding collective consciousness (will be uploading some new articles in the next few days).
Much love and blessings to you all
Katie
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
Fourth of July: not just about fireworks and barbeques
The 4th of July is not just a holiday for fireworks and barbeques; it’s a holiday to celebrate independence and freedom of the United States from tyrannical rule. But how many Americans are fully aware that we are losing our freedoms at an unprecedented rate? Is America still truly the land of the free and the home of the brave? Or has it been gradually been taken over by something more sinister… How many are aware that, hidden beneath the façade of the left /right, democrat /republican debate, that a ruthless elitist corporatocracy has all but taken over the political process in America?
Due to my flexible schedule, I have a lot of time on my hands to read a variety of sources and it seems that in the past few years part of my role has been to read, research and observe what busy people who have faster lives may not have time to keep track of. I have been sharing of these observations with close friends for several years, but I feel, at this point, that it is my duty to inform others of what I am seeing. Since April 2009 in fact, it seems that things have been speeding up considerably in the "laws that curtail freedom" department, and not in a good way. During the Bush years many could see quite clearly what was going on here in America, but now, under the (at least on the surface) more benign look of Obama, many people seem to not be aware of at all, as a host of new bills quietly make it into law under the radar. Many people seem to have just stopped paying attention, thinking that by winning the elections with Obama, all is finally well. Unfortunately it is not so, as, covertly, the agenda of the corporatocracy keeps on trucking,just as potently as it did before.
Legislation is being gradually put into place, on the back of previous horrid legislation passed under the Bush administration, such as the Patriot Acts I and II (which is still in force, as Obama has not recalled or amended it any of it), which is a real threat to freedom in this country. Each individual piece of legislation is not that bad taken on its own, but when seeing the whole comprehensive picture of all these individual laws acting together, we can see that brick by brick a trap is being built which will severely threaten freedom of speech, freedom of travel and freedom to dissent. And my feeling is that we are not going to be aware of the full extent of this erosion of liberties, at the collective level, until every single piece of legislation has been put into place. The covert rulers will only slam this trap shut when all the pieces of legislation are in place to assure full control and we may indeed find ourselves with very little room to maneuver when that happens…in a nutshell, it will be too late. So the time to be aware of this is now. As now we can still do something about it all. Many of you know that I am an intuitive/psychic and what I see is that we have time between now and September/October 2009 to turn this state of affairs around, but that later than that, we will find it harder and harder to make a change without things getting really complicated (or ugly).
So what are the laws and threats that I speak of. First of all, you need to be aware that, under the guise of stopping “homegrown terrorism” (which is a falsehood by the way, just another boogieman to frighten you with, so that you will willingly trade your freedom for the illusion of security), the DHS is expanding its potential terrorist watch list to include free thinkers and dissenters of all kinds. Look at this list (see link below) and tell me if this does not include…everybody. Anybody could be labeled as a terrorist under at least one of these definitions. Please take a look at this document.
The Department of Homeland Security Lexicon for Homegrown Terrorism/Extremism
Then after you have taken a look at that, keep in mind that the DHS is the one that draft the no fly lists, who determine who can or cannot travel by plane in the US. And after you have understood this piece, look at this video where Raul Emmanuel, Obama’s chief of staff, is promoting the extension of the no fly list to a no right to bear arms to whoever is on the list.
Now I know a lot of my UK people are going to say…good, we have no guns, people should have no guns, guns are dangerous. And in the past I used to agree. However it’s not that simple. However we feel about guns, we just need to be aware that taking the guns away from the populace is one of the classical steps that precedes the locking down of an open society into a dictatorship. A disarmed populace is much easier to take over than an armed one. Simple. And btw, limiting movement of travel ad closing borders is also a classical move of an emerging dictatorship. So as the no fly lists expand, beware.
To learn more about the most common steps used in dictatorship creation I suggest you watch this excellent speech by Naomi Wolf:
The end of America by Naomi Wolf
So, getting back to the initial point… the DHS list is getting bigger, and with the new lexicon definition potentially anybody can make it on that list, as the DHS lexicon pretty much can include anybody that has any kind of opinion about anything. Now also combine that with the powers that are given to the government in dealing with terrorists, which now also include the homegrown variety, the people on the list, i.e. potentially anybody with an opinion, i.e potentially you. The gvt has the power to detain terrorist including the homegrowns, which we have already established could now be anybody, (including you) to indefinite detention on suspicion. Watch this piece on the mainstream media if you need to hear this from a non alternative source:
Rachel Maddox on Indefinite Detention
Also now add to this piece the fact that, very quietly and unbeknown to most, the supreme court on May 25th 2009 overturned the 1986 ruling that forbid the police from questioning suspects without their attorney present, creating a limitation r suspension of the Miranda rights under certain circumstances. Michigan v Jackson established the rule that if someone accused of a crime has an attorney or has requested the appointment of an attorney by the court, police may not question them without that attorney being present even if the accused agrees to waive the right to have their attorney present during that particular session of questioning. Under Jackson, any waiver of that right was presumed to be invalid because it was not made with the advice of counsel. However now that ruling as been overturned. You may ask, why is this a problem? Because now the police can try to convince a person (who may be frightened or uniformed or not the smartest tool in the box) to waive their right to an attorney, hence putting them ( especially the not smartest tools in the box) in a position where they are very vulnerable to manipulation and intimidation, which is what this ruling was designed to prevent. How many of you had even heard about this bit…most people have no clue. Find a link to this here:
Supreme Court overturns Michigan v Jackson
Ok so, now having established that basically if you make it on the DHS watch list you are (or soon will be), by rule of law, stripped of many of your rights and having established that just about anybody can now make it on the list, lets look at freedom of speech on the web, so that we can see the building blocks going into place in this arena too.
Already, anybody with a strong opinion on something, somebody writing a blog on patriot and constitutional issues and even someone writing about very personal issues such as abortion or animal rights may be unfortunate enough to land on the homegrown extremist list. But that not sufficing, we now have a bunch of laws and proposed laws, which are going to make writing on the web even more interesting.
Bills are in congress to criminalize free speech on the Internet. One of such bills is the Cyber-Bullying Act, which will now make hurting somebody’s feelings online a felony. This bill, introduced in a typical problem-reaction –solution fashion, is being ushered in with the excuse of protecting children or teenagers who have suffered emotional hurt due to things that were said about them online. Which seems sensible enough, none of us want kids to be upset by online slander or bullying. But lets look at the bigger picture: with such a law in place, anybody can claim to be emotionally hurt but something someone said online and be accused of a felony for it. And how do we define emotional hurt? Many people get very upset when anybody questions the official 911 story for example. Would all 911 truthers now be accused of a felony under the cyber-bullying act because their opinions are hurting somebody’s feelings? You can quickly see how this law can be misused. There is plenty of room here to shut down any kind of online free speech.
Fox new on the Cyber-Bullyign Act
Cyber-Bulling Act and Free Speech
This ruling aside we are also seeing many lawsuits being brought against bloggers, who are now being considered “international publishers” and therefore liable for defamation and to all the rules that apply to mainstream journalists. However mainstream journalists usually work in newspapers that have a fact-checking department or get paid a handsome salary to do so themselves. I can tell you firsthand from my experience in writing articles for magazines that there is a huge difference between writing something "off the cuff" blogger style and writing an article that will be published professionally, where sources and where all fact checking and accuracy of sources needs to be tracked. The few times in which I have had to do this for some expose articles I wrote on Antidepressants, Psychotropics and Big Pharma, it would take me almost two weeks to write that kind of article. It takes a lot of time to do the research to back up ones claims in a foolproof manner, which is why expose journalists for mainstream magazines get paid the big bucks. Most bloggers , even those of a journalistic disposition , don’t have the time nor the resources to do that kind of legwork. Treating bloggers as proper publishers, if these standards were enforced, could damage the informal informational free speech tone that has emerged from bloggers in recent years in a major way. And reduce the major impact that citizen journalism has had on changes ion our society in recent years. And of course this is not random. The corporately owned mainstream media is going bankrupt as more and more people get their information online. And even more so, the MSM has been a great mind control force used by the "rulers of the corporatocracy" in shaping opinion in their favor. They are loosing they grip of control and we are now seeing the build up of a fully fledged assault on bloggers and free speech online, as I will illustrate soon , as the Cyber-Bullying Act and the Bloggers as International Publishers is not the only thing going on.
Due to my flexible schedule, I have a lot of time on my hands to read a variety of sources and it seems that in the past few years part of my role has been to read, research and observe what busy people who have faster lives may not have time to keep track of. I have been sharing of these observations with close friends for several years, but I feel, at this point, that it is my duty to inform others of what I am seeing. Since April 2009 in fact, it seems that things have been speeding up considerably in the "laws that curtail freedom" department, and not in a good way. During the Bush years many could see quite clearly what was going on here in America, but now, under the (at least on the surface) more benign look of Obama, many people seem to not be aware of at all, as a host of new bills quietly make it into law under the radar. Many people seem to have just stopped paying attention, thinking that by winning the elections with Obama, all is finally well. Unfortunately it is not so, as, covertly, the agenda of the corporatocracy keeps on trucking,just as potently as it did before.
Legislation is being gradually put into place, on the back of previous horrid legislation passed under the Bush administration, such as the Patriot Acts I and II (which is still in force, as Obama has not recalled or amended it any of it), which is a real threat to freedom in this country. Each individual piece of legislation is not that bad taken on its own, but when seeing the whole comprehensive picture of all these individual laws acting together, we can see that brick by brick a trap is being built which will severely threaten freedom of speech, freedom of travel and freedom to dissent. And my feeling is that we are not going to be aware of the full extent of this erosion of liberties, at the collective level, until every single piece of legislation has been put into place. The covert rulers will only slam this trap shut when all the pieces of legislation are in place to assure full control and we may indeed find ourselves with very little room to maneuver when that happens…in a nutshell, it will be too late. So the time to be aware of this is now. As now we can still do something about it all. Many of you know that I am an intuitive/psychic and what I see is that we have time between now and September/October 2009 to turn this state of affairs around, but that later than that, we will find it harder and harder to make a change without things getting really complicated (or ugly).
So what are the laws and threats that I speak of. First of all, you need to be aware that, under the guise of stopping “homegrown terrorism” (which is a falsehood by the way, just another boogieman to frighten you with, so that you will willingly trade your freedom for the illusion of security), the DHS is expanding its potential terrorist watch list to include free thinkers and dissenters of all kinds. Look at this list (see link below) and tell me if this does not include…everybody. Anybody could be labeled as a terrorist under at least one of these definitions. Please take a look at this document.
The Department of Homeland Security Lexicon for Homegrown Terrorism/Extremism
Then after you have taken a look at that, keep in mind that the DHS is the one that draft the no fly lists, who determine who can or cannot travel by plane in the US. And after you have understood this piece, look at this video where Raul Emmanuel, Obama’s chief of staff, is promoting the extension of the no fly list to a no right to bear arms to whoever is on the list.
Now I know a lot of my UK people are going to say…good, we have no guns, people should have no guns, guns are dangerous. And in the past I used to agree. However it’s not that simple. However we feel about guns, we just need to be aware that taking the guns away from the populace is one of the classical steps that precedes the locking down of an open society into a dictatorship. A disarmed populace is much easier to take over than an armed one. Simple. And btw, limiting movement of travel ad closing borders is also a classical move of an emerging dictatorship. So as the no fly lists expand, beware.
To learn more about the most common steps used in dictatorship creation I suggest you watch this excellent speech by Naomi Wolf:
The end of America by Naomi Wolf
So, getting back to the initial point… the DHS list is getting bigger, and with the new lexicon definition potentially anybody can make it on that list, as the DHS lexicon pretty much can include anybody that has any kind of opinion about anything. Now also combine that with the powers that are given to the government in dealing with terrorists, which now also include the homegrown variety, the people on the list, i.e. potentially anybody with an opinion, i.e potentially you. The gvt has the power to detain terrorist including the homegrowns, which we have already established could now be anybody, (including you) to indefinite detention on suspicion. Watch this piece on the mainstream media if you need to hear this from a non alternative source:
Rachel Maddox on Indefinite Detention
Also now add to this piece the fact that, very quietly and unbeknown to most, the supreme court on May 25th 2009 overturned the 1986 ruling that forbid the police from questioning suspects without their attorney present, creating a limitation r suspension of the Miranda rights under certain circumstances. Michigan v Jackson established the rule that if someone accused of a crime has an attorney or has requested the appointment of an attorney by the court, police may not question them without that attorney being present even if the accused agrees to waive the right to have their attorney present during that particular session of questioning. Under Jackson, any waiver of that right was presumed to be invalid because it was not made with the advice of counsel. However now that ruling as been overturned. You may ask, why is this a problem? Because now the police can try to convince a person (who may be frightened or uniformed or not the smartest tool in the box) to waive their right to an attorney, hence putting them ( especially the not smartest tools in the box) in a position where they are very vulnerable to manipulation and intimidation, which is what this ruling was designed to prevent. How many of you had even heard about this bit…most people have no clue. Find a link to this here:
Supreme Court overturns Michigan v Jackson
Ok so, now having established that basically if you make it on the DHS watch list you are (or soon will be), by rule of law, stripped of many of your rights and having established that just about anybody can now make it on the list, lets look at freedom of speech on the web, so that we can see the building blocks going into place in this arena too.
Already, anybody with a strong opinion on something, somebody writing a blog on patriot and constitutional issues and even someone writing about very personal issues such as abortion or animal rights may be unfortunate enough to land on the homegrown extremist list. But that not sufficing, we now have a bunch of laws and proposed laws, which are going to make writing on the web even more interesting.
Bills are in congress to criminalize free speech on the Internet. One of such bills is the Cyber-Bullying Act, which will now make hurting somebody’s feelings online a felony. This bill, introduced in a typical problem-reaction –solution fashion, is being ushered in with the excuse of protecting children or teenagers who have suffered emotional hurt due to things that were said about them online. Which seems sensible enough, none of us want kids to be upset by online slander or bullying. But lets look at the bigger picture: with such a law in place, anybody can claim to be emotionally hurt but something someone said online and be accused of a felony for it. And how do we define emotional hurt? Many people get very upset when anybody questions the official 911 story for example. Would all 911 truthers now be accused of a felony under the cyber-bullying act because their opinions are hurting somebody’s feelings? You can quickly see how this law can be misused. There is plenty of room here to shut down any kind of online free speech.
Fox new on the Cyber-Bullyign Act
Cyber-Bulling Act and Free Speech
This ruling aside we are also seeing many lawsuits being brought against bloggers, who are now being considered “international publishers” and therefore liable for defamation and to all the rules that apply to mainstream journalists. However mainstream journalists usually work in newspapers that have a fact-checking department or get paid a handsome salary to do so themselves. I can tell you firsthand from my experience in writing articles for magazines that there is a huge difference between writing something "off the cuff" blogger style and writing an article that will be published professionally, where sources and where all fact checking and accuracy of sources needs to be tracked. The few times in which I have had to do this for some expose articles I wrote on Antidepressants, Psychotropics and Big Pharma, it would take me almost two weeks to write that kind of article. It takes a lot of time to do the research to back up ones claims in a foolproof manner, which is why expose journalists for mainstream magazines get paid the big bucks. Most bloggers , even those of a journalistic disposition , don’t have the time nor the resources to do that kind of legwork. Treating bloggers as proper publishers, if these standards were enforced, could damage the informal informational free speech tone that has emerged from bloggers in recent years in a major way. And reduce the major impact that citizen journalism has had on changes ion our society in recent years. And of course this is not random. The corporately owned mainstream media is going bankrupt as more and more people get their information online. And even more so, the MSM has been a great mind control force used by the "rulers of the corporatocracy" in shaping opinion in their favor. They are loosing they grip of control and we are now seeing the build up of a fully fledged assault on bloggers and free speech online, as I will illustrate soon , as the Cyber-Bullying Act and the Bloggers as International Publishers is not the only thing going on.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
